![]() CrashPlan: Client and client setupĬrashPlan is available as a desktop platform for macOS, Windows, and Linux computers, or it can be installed on Linux servers. That means you can keep a catalog of file versions that extends for years rather than months. Importantly, the software doesn’t automatically remove deleted files from your cloud storage without permission. That’s extremely important when recovering from file corruptions or ransomware, since you may need to go back a few versions to find a clean copy of your damaged files. You’re able to keep old versions of files indefinitely, and you have a significant amount of control over how file versions are kept with CrashPlan. ![]() That means you can create one or more physical recovery hard drives as well as keep a catalog of files for recovery in the cloud.įile versioning, a feature usually associated with backup tools, is another strength for CrashPlan. ![]() But, you can also back up files to multiple storage locations at the same time. (Image credit: CrashPlan)ĬrashPlan comes with its own unlimited cloud storage space, which serves as the default launch point for file recovery. Going to get my mother moved over to it soon as her PC was having major performance issues with crashplan using enough memory her computer runs crazy slow, so the lighter client will be a big deal there.You can customize your versioning settings to better recover after a ransomware attack. That's the kind of thing I would take advantage of. The big value is their shipped drive restore service. I never really needed the deleted file history so for me that value is fine. They were giving me like 300kb and even 10mbit is 30x faster, which is acceptable. It runs much faster than crashplan even on way less concurrent. I tweaked the settings to do 16 concurrent connections with no throttling. I'm sitting on a gigabit upload connection with crazy good latency and it was briefly sending data so fast I could get my entire 2tb seeded in under a week if that pace keeps up. They picked off the bulk of the small files first so it's through 80% of the files but only 12% of the data. I had to tweak the exclusion list since I have a bunch of VMs and windows installers on my Mac but it started screaming through the backup. I setup Backblaze last night and let it start to run. Not to mention 3 computers is starting to get expensive. I hear good things about backblaze now days, but the 30 days thing is a problem, particularly wrt external drives. I used to use the peer-to-peer backup mode as well. Also, I started using it years ago when they were WAY better than any other Mac online backup. ) Yes the bloated client was a downside but the upside was worth it. Also you didn’t have to make sure external drives were online during a backup at least once a month. The biggest reason is because they kept deleted files indefinitely vs 30 days for backblaze (realize 3 months later that a file is missing or corrupt? No problem, it and previous versions are still backed up. is it because they were cheap? You get what you pay for. Never understood why they were so universally popular. I made use of their free trial period, and the performance terrified me so much that I decided it wasn't right for me. I was upset with Crashplan's horrible client performance and was considering moving anyways. The best way is to use multiple backup solutions and test them regularly to make sure they work. I’ve read many posts about crash plan backups in the cloud corrupted and unrecoverable. It would be foolish to assume other backup software like backblaze or crash plan are bug free. That might be forgivable if it were a short-term thing, but no one noticed for over a month that something was wrong.īugs happen and they came clean with it and issued an update as soon as they realized the error. Both allow you to choose from multiple cloud services, sftp and local.Īrq seems appealing, but I'm not sure that I trust them after this incident earlier this year- there was a period of about a month and a half where the Arq client was silently and unrecoverably deleting old backup objects. I think Arq and ChronoSync are the best options out there. Practically, it's impossible to "roll your own" everything, but the less dependent you are on any one service the better off you are. Without being preachy, this is the inherent problem with becoming dependent on cloud/software services.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |